Florida FSCA · Free scan · No signup

Received a Florida wiretapping demand letter?

FSCA claims over website tracking exploded after a March 2025 federal ruling — hundreds of suits and small-claims actions so far. Before you respond or pay, see the evidence the claim is built on: a free scan shows every tracker your site fires before visitors consent, graded in 90 seconds.

Which law do you want to check?

Letter or summons in hand and need to move fast?

Book a 20-min call — we’ll walk your scan results and show what a fix looks like.

Book a call →

Why you got this letter

The FSCA — Florida’s all-party-consent wiretap statute — became the new front in website-tracking litigation when W.W. v. Orlando Health (M.D. Fla., March 2025) let claims over tracking tools proceed. Filers run automated scans for session replay, chat widgets, and pixels firing before consent, then send templated letters and small-claims complaints in batches. Your site was almost certainly found by a scanner, not an investigator.

Recognize the letterhead?

A few filers account for most Florida volume. If your letter or summons matches one of these, you are one of many recipients of a template campaign — which changes how your counsel will price it. Everything below is drawn from court records and legal-industry reporting.

What to do in the first 48 hours

  1. 1

    Don’t ignore it — small-claims deadlines are short

    Many FSCA campaigns file directly in Florida small-claims court, where response windows are tight and a missed date can mean a default judgment. Whether you got a pre-suit letter or a summons, calendar the deadline first — then decide how to respond.

  2. 2

    Find out what your site actually exposes

    FSCA claims are built on the same evidence as their California CIPA cousins: session-replay scripts, chat widgets, and pixels capturing visitor interactions before consent. The free scan above records every tracker that fires on your site pre-consent — the same picture the sender’s tooling captured. Knowing whether the claim is accurate changes every decision that follows.

  3. 3

    Stop the pre-consent tracking now

    The statute provides for damages per violation, so trackers that keep firing keep adding theoretical exposure. Gating session replay, chat, and pixels behind consent doesn’t erase past conduct, but it caps it — and a documented fix date is something your counsel will want.

  4. 4

    Bring the letter and the scan report to Florida defense counsel

    FSCA website-wiretapping law is young — W.W. v. Orlando Health opened the door in March 2025 and key defenses (consent, party exemption, what counts as an "interception") are still being litigated. A Florida defense attorney who has handled these campaigns can price yours quickly. PieEye is not a law firm and nothing on this page is legal advice.

FSCA demand letter FAQ

What is the FSCA and can they really sue over session replay or a chat widget?
The Florida Security of Communications Act (Fla. Stat. §934) is Florida’s all-party-consent wiretap statute. In March 2025, a federal court in W.W. v. Orlando Health allowed FSCA claims over website tracking tools to proceed, and hundreds of suits and demand letters have followed — targeting session replay, chat widgets, and advertising pixels. Outcomes vary: consent, the party exemption, and what counts as an intercepted "communication" are all actively contested defenses.
Why is mine a small-claims case for $500–$2,500?
The dominant Florida playbook files individual small-claims actions rather than class actions: amounts small enough that hiring defense counsel costs more than settling, filed in volume across many defendants. That economic design is worth understanding before you pay — it also means the complaint against you is almost certainly a template, not an investigation of your business.
If I fix my website, does the claim go away?
No — removing pre-consent tracking stops new exposure from accruing but does not extinguish claims about past conduct. It does materially improve your position: it caps damages theories, removes ongoing-violation leverage, and takes you off the target list these campaigns rescan.
I also do business in California. Is this related to CIPA demand letters?
Same playbook, different statute. California’s CIPA wave came first; Florida’s FSCA wave copied it after the 2025 Orlando Health ruling. If you got a CIPA letter too — or want to check your California exposure — see our CIPA demand letter guide. The scan on this page checks both regimes at once.
Will PieEye tell me whether to pay or fight?
No. PieEye is not a law firm and does not give legal advice. What we give you is the factual record: exactly which trackers fire on your site before consent, graded against FSCA, CIPA, and three other regimes — the evidence baseline you and your attorney need to evaluate the letter. Fixing what the scan finds is what our consent platform does.

Go deeper

PieEye is a privacy-compliance software company, not a law firm. Nothing on this page is legal advice, and reading it does not create an attorney–client relationship. Statements about specific filers are drawn from the cited court records and legal-industry publications. If you have received a demand letter, arbitration demand, or summons, consult a licensed attorney about your specific situation.